Business Valuation Disputes: What Attorneys Should Expect

By: Eli C. Neal

Business valuation disputes can be challenging and complex when there are two experts on opposing sides.

Here’s what you should realistically expect:

1. The Valuation Will Be Rebuilt

In many cases, attorneys expect a forensic accountant to “check the math” on an opposing valuation report.

Both sides’ forensic accountants will often:

  • Reconstruct financial statements from raw data

  • Adjust for non-recurring or disguised transactions

  • Normalize owner compensation and discretionary expenses

  • Recalculate earnings or cash flow bases (EBITDA, SDE, etc.)

  • Recalculate the valuation procedures

This means there is often a parallel valuation model designed to test the original conclusions.

2. The Fight Is Usually Over Adjusted Earnings, Not Revenue

Most valuation disputes don’t hinge on top-line revenue.

They hinge on earnings and consideration of the following adjustments:

  • Owner perks disguised as expenses

  • Personal expenses run through the business

  • One-time gains or losses improperly included

  • Underreported cash income

  • Timing manipulation of revenue or expenses

3. The Importance of Discovery

If the company’s underlying financial data is suspected to be unreliable, discovery will be important. Attorneys should expect requests for the following:

  • General ledgers (not just summaries)

  • Bank statements across all accounts

  • Credit card records tied to the business and owners

  • Payroll records and contractor payments

4. “Normalized Earnings” May Be Contested

Many valuations rely on normalized earnings to reflect true economic reality.

Common disagreements over adjustments can include:

  • Whether owner compensation is “market rate”

  • The appropriate amount of add-backs

  • Whether discretionary spending is a personal benefit

  • Whether revenue trends are sustainable

5. Opposing Experts May Not Agree on Everything

In valuation disputes, it is possible for experts to:

  • Use different normalization assumptions

  • Apply different multiples or valuation methods

  • Disagree on growth projections

  • Produce materially different valuations from the same data set

Forensic accountants should make any disagreements transparent and clear to the parties, attorneys, and trier-of-fact. Forensic accountants should also be prepared to provide rationale for why their assumptions and methods are reliable.

Final Takeaway

Business valuation disputes take special care from the forensic accountants to produce transparent, thorough, and well-reasoned work products. 4 Corners specializes in insightful, reliable, and credible financial conclusions. We’d love to help you.


4 Corners is located in the Greater Seattle area, serving clients in Seattle, Bellevue, Redmond, and all throughout the Pacific Northwest. If you are an attorney or business owner and believe you could use our help, please give 4 Corners a call at 425.800.4792 or email us; we’ll listen to your situation and help you scope your project.

We’d love to help you.

Next
Next

What a Financial Forensic Investigation Typically Looks Like